All Issue

2022 Vol.24, Issue 3 Preview Page

Research article

Analysis of methane production efficiency improvement effect by hydrothermal carbonization reaction in combined process of anaerobic digestion and hydrothermal carbonization of livestock manure

가축분뇨의 혐기소화와 수열탄화 복합 공정에서 수열탄화 반응에 의한 메탄 생산 효율 증진 효과 분석

Jun-Hyeong Lee1
,
Young-Man Yoon23*
이 준형1
,
윤 영만23*
1Ph.D.Candidate, Department of Plant & Environmental Science, Hankyong National University, 327 Jungang, Anseong, Gyeonggi, 17579, Republic of Korea
2Professor, Department of Plant & Environmental Science, Hankyong National University, 327 Jungang, Anseong, Gyeonggi, 17579, Republic of Korea
3Director, Biogas Research Center, Hankyong National University, 327 Jungang, Anseong, Gyeonggi, 17579, Republic of Korea
1한경국립대학교 식물생명환경전공 박사과정
2한경국립대학교 식물생명환경전공 교수
3한경국립대학교 바이오가스연구센터 센터장
*Corresponding Author
31 December 2022. pp. 107-116
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Korea produced cattle manure has high energy potential due to its high solids content, including sawdust. However, it is difficult to use sawdust as a raw material for anaerobic digestion due to its high content of non-degradable organic materials. This study used hydrothermal carbonization, one of the hydrolysis processes, to analyze the effect of improving methane production efficiency through hydrothermal carbonization using livestock manure anaerobic digestion sludge as a raw material. The hydrothermal carbonization reaction was carried out under temperature conditions of 160, 180, 200 and 220°C. As result of the study, the biochemical methane potentials at 160, 180, 200 and 220°C were 0.092, 0.145, 0.206 and 0.245 Nm3/kg-VSadded. However, the increase in hydrocarbonization reaction temperature reduces organic matter that can be converted into methane during the reaction process, and the methane production obtained at 1 ton when ADSC is hydrocarbonized is 3.08, 4.80, 6.49, and 6.28 Nm3/ton-ADSC, the highest at 200°C.

Keywords
Anaerobic digestion
Biochemical methane potential
Cattle manure
Hydrothermal carbonization
References
1
Abubakar, B., Ismail, N., 2012. Anaerobic digestion of cow dung for biogas production. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 7(2), 169-72.
2
Ahring, B.K., Ibrahim, A.A., Mladenovska, Z., 2001. Effect of temperature increase from 55 to 65 degrees C on performance and microbial population dynamics of an anaerobic reactor treating cattle manure. Water Research, 35, 2446-52. 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00526-111394779
3
Amon, T., Amon, B., Kryvoruchko, V., Zollitsch, W., Mayer, K., Gruber, L., 2007. Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure-influence of biomass composition on the methane yield. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 118(1-4), 173-82. 10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.007
4
Bougrier, C., Delgenès, J.P., Carrère, H., 2008. Effects of thermal treatments on five different waste activated sludge samples solubilisation, physical properties and anaerobic digestion. Chemical Engineering Journal, 139(2), 236-44. 10.1016/j.cej.2007.07.099
5
Boyle, W., 1977. Energy recovery from sanitary landfills-a review. Microbial Energy Conversion, 119-38. 10.1016/B978-0-08-021791-8.50019-6
6
Cao, Z., Jung, D., Olszewski, M.P., Arauzo, P.J., Kruse, A., 2019. Hydrothermal carbonization of biogas digestate: Effect of digestate origin and process conditions. Waste Management, 100, 138-50. 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.09.00931536924
7
Carlsson, M., Lagerkvist, A., Morgan-Sagastume, F., 2012. The effects of substrate pre-treatment on anaerobic digestion systems: a review. Waste Management, 32(9), 1634-50. 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.04.01622633466
8
Choi, H., Kham, D.H., Song, J., Jeon, B., Jeon, J., Yoo, Y., 2008. Survey on housing types of korean native cattle and beef cattle by farm scale and region. Journal of Animal Environmental Science, 14(3), 167-74.
9
Demirer, G., Chen, S., 2005. Two-phase anaerobic digestion of unscreened dairy manure. Process biochemistry, 40(11), 3542-9. 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.062
10
Duncan, D.B., 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11(1), 1-42. 10.2307/3001478
11
Gao, Y., Liu, Y., Zhu, G., Xu, J., Yuan, Q., Zhu, Y., 2018. Microwave-assisted hydrothermal carbonization of dairy manure: Chemical and structural properties of the products. Energy, 165, 662-72. 10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.185
12
Ghanim, B.M., Pandey, D.S., Kwapinski, W., Leahy, J.J., 2016. Hydrothermal carbonisation of poultry litter: Effects of treatment temperature and residence time on yields and chemical properties of hydrochars. Bioresource Technology, 216, 373-80. 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.08727262091
13
Gossett, R.W., Brown, D.A., Young, D.R., 1981. Predicting the bioaccumulation and toxicity of organic compounds. Coastal Water Research Project Biennial Report, 1982, 149-56.
14
Jain, S., Sharma, M., 2011. Power generation from MSW of Haridwar city: A feasibility study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 69-90. 10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.007
15
Jeong, K.H., Kim, J.K., Lee, D.J., Lee, D.H., Jeon, J.H., 2018. Effect of Semi-Dry Anaerobic Digestion Using Dairy Cattle Manure and Pig Slurry. Journal of the Korea Organic Resources Recycling Association, 26(2), 85-93.
16
Kalia, A.K., Singh, S.P., 2001. Effect of mixing digested slurry on the rate of biogas production from dairy manure in batch fermenter. Energy Sources, 23(8), 711-5. 10.1080/009083101316862462
17
Kim, H., Jeon, Y.W., 2015. Effects of hydro-thermal reaction temperature on anaerobic biodegradability of piggery manure hydrolysate. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 48(6), 602-9. 10.7745/KJSSF.2015.48.6.602
18
Kim, S.H., Kim, H., Kim, C.H., Yoon, Y.M., 2012. Effect of the pretreatment by thermal hydrolysis on biochemical methane potential of piggery sludge. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 45(4), 524-31. 10.7745/KJSSF.2012.45.4.524
19
Lay, J.J., Li, Y.Y., Noike, T., 1998. Mathematical model for methane production from landfill bioreactor. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 124(8), 730-6. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1998)124:8(730)
20
Luna-deRisco, M., Normak, A., Orupõld, K., 2011. Biochemical methane potential of different organic wastes and energy crops from Estonia. Agronomy Research, 9(1-2), 331-42.
21
Marañó, N, E., Castrillón, L., Vázquez, I., Sastre, H., 2001. The influence of hydraulic residence time on the treatment of cattle manure in UASB reactors. Waste Management & Research, 19(5), 436-41. 10.1177/0734242X010190050811954729
22
Marin-Batista, J., Villamil, J., Qaramaleki, S., Coronella, C., Mohedano, A., de La Rubia, M., 2020. Energy valorization of cow manure by hydrothermal carbonization and anaerobic digestion. Renewable Energy, 160, 623-32. 10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.003
23
Martins, S.I., Jongen, W.M., Van Boekel, M.A., 2000. A review of Maillard reaction in food and implications to kinetic modelling. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 11(9-10), 364-73. 10.1016/S0924-2244(01)00022-X
24
ME, 2020. Livestock manure generation and treatment status, Ministry of Environment, Sejong, Korea.
25
Mendez, A., Gascó, G., Ruiz, B., Fuente, E., 2019. Hydrochars from industrial macroalgae “Gelidium Sesquipedale” biomass wastes. Bioresource Technology, 275, 386-93. 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.07430602135
26
MOTIE, 2018. New & Renewable energy white paper (in Kotrean). Ministry of Industry and Energy, Sejong, Korea.
27
Nasir, I.M., Mohd Ghazi, T.I., Omar, R., 2012. Anaerobic digestion technology in livestock manure treatment for biogas production: a review. Engineering in Life Sciences, 12(3), 258-69. 10.1002/elsc.201100150
28
Oh, S.Y., Yoon, Y.M., 2017. Energy recovery efficiency of poultry slaughterhouse sludge cake by hydrothermal carbonization. Energies, 10(11), 1876. 10.3390/en10111876
29
Omar, R., Harun, R.M., Mohd Ghazi, T., Wan Azlina, W., Idris, A., Yunus, R., editors. 2008. Anaerobic treatment of cattle manure for biogas production. Proceedings Philadelphia, Annual meeting of American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
30
Park, M., Kim, N., Lee, S., Yeon, S., Seo, J.H., Park, D., 2019. A study of solubilization of sewage sludge by hydrothermal treatment. Journal of Environmental Management, 250, 109490. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.10949031505383
31
Ramke, H.G., Blöhse, D., Lehmann, H.J., Fettig, J., 2009. Hydrothermal carbonization of organic waste. Cossu, R, Diaz, LF, Stegman, R(edts), Twelfth International Waste Management and Landfill Symphosium Sardina: Pro, CISA pub.
32
Rao, M. S., Singh, S. P., Singh, A. K., Sodha M. S., 2000. Bioenergy conversion studies of organic fraction of MSW: Assessment of ultimate bioenergy production of municipal garbage. Applied Energy, 66, 75-87. 10.1016/S0306-2619(99)00056-2
33
Rice, E., Baird, R., Eaton, A., Clesceri, L., 2012. APHA (American Public Health Association): Standard method for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington DC (US): AWWA (American Water Works Association) and WEF (Water Environment Federation).
34
Sørensen, A.H., Winther-Nielsen, M., Ahring, B.K., 1991. Kinetics of lactate, acetate and propionate in unadapted and lactate-adapted thermophilic, anaerobic sewage sludge: the influence of sludge adaptation for start-up of thermophilic UASB-reactors. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 34(6), 823-7. 10.1007/BF00169358
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society of Animal Environmental Science & Technology
  • Publisher(Ko) :(사)한국축산환경학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Animal Environmental Science
  • Journal Title(Ko) :축산시설환경학회지
  • Volume : 24
  • No :3
  • Pages :107-116
  • Received Date : 2022-11-24
  • Revised Date : 2022-12-16
  • Accepted Date : 2022-12-19
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.11109/JAES.2022.24.3.107
Journal Informaiton Journal of Animal Environmental Science Journal of Animal Environmental Science
Online Submission
Archives
: Vol. 1, 1995~
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close